Hollywood has been cranking out remakes, sequels, and prequels like it's their job lately. Some classics I think should have remained untouched (such as Footloose) at least for a few more decades or so, but there are some adaptations and films that I believe could truly benefit from a new adaptation. Here are my top five for the moment:
5) Anne of Green Gables
(Side Note: I had never seen this poster before searching for it. Pretty unique!) This three-hour pretty darn faithful to the book adaptation of the times novel was a classic. But, 3 HOURS! With the exception of movies like Lord of the Rings, it's difficult to keep an audience glued to the screen for that long anymore. Granted, this film was originally a two-part miniseries on TV. But, the next three films in the series departed so much from the novels, that by the third film, I got to wondering if I could have kept watching without Megan Follows playing Anne. I think if put in the reins of the right director and actors, there could be some potential to make this more accessible to a new generation, especially with the many books in the series, this could be a very profitable franchise. But if it never happens, so be it. The first film is still one of my all time favorites and a very well done adaptation.
4) Scooby-Doo
One of my favorite cartoons as a kid became the biggest cheap shot adaptations of all time. The only thing that I can say was truly good about this movie was the performances of Matthew Lillard (who completely NAILED the role) as Shaggy and Linda Cardellini as Velma. There was so much potty humor and sexual innuendos, if I ever meet the writer of the film, I may have to slug him. Its sequel was a much better attempt, but still had some serious creative issues and had more ridiculous humor that the first film suffered from. Alas, Scooby-Doo is so steeped in pop culture and has so many direct-to-video sequels, I don't think they'll ever do another big-screen adaptation. I sure wish they would have done some re-writes on that script...
3) The Last Airbender
My gosh. What didn't go wrong with this film? I have very little faith left in the director M. Night Shyamalan (director of The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, Signs). I honestly don't know how he did it. The only thing he got right about this was the basic story line of the animated series (which is AMAZING and everyone should have a chance to watch). I mean, all he had to do was copy and paste the dialogue of the animated series into a script and the audiences would have fallen in love with it. But instead he decided to strip the film of everything that made the animated series the great series that it is: humor, originality, and heart. I don't even need to mention his previous box office flops prior to this, but if I was a big-wig in Hollywood, I wouldn't trust him with anything at this point after what he did to this film. Just about anyone who tries to remake this film (and hopefully they will given the flop it was among critics and audiences alike) will do a better job than him.
2) Star Wars Episode Three: Revenge of the Sith
I may be inciting the wrath of Star Wars fans everywhere and I understand completely that a remake will never happen, but I've got to say, the biggest mistake of George Lucas's career was allowing Hayden Christensen to fill the shoes of one of the most iconic film villains of all time: Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker. They may as well have cast Jon Heder. At least I would have known I couldn't take it seriously anymore. Christensen is the worst excuse for actor in this movie (and I really don't care for the other films I've seen him in either). Even Natalie Portman is passable as Padme, but really? REALLY? The most important character arc and aspect of this film was Anakin and the only thing that Christensen could've done worse was tried to hold the script and read his lines as they filmed it. In Lucas's defense, the rest of the movie as a whole is decent. But talk about the biggest letdown ever...
1) All the Pretty Horses
This is another classic "where-to-begin" with what went wrong during the production of this film. First off, let me mention this is an adaptation of one of the best novels of all time by renowned American author Cormac McCarthy. Billy Bob Thornton originally created a somewhere between 3-4 hour cut of this film and then Miramax hauled off and did perhaps the WORST hack editing job ever. Along with that hacking went the original score of the film by Daniel Lanois, perhaps forever ruining any chances of letting the original/director's cut of the film, because in so doing, Lanois refused to let his score be released to the public. Billy Bob won't work with Miramax ever again (at least as a director) after what they did. Perhaps because they didn't like the postmodern Western feel of the book, the studio execs tried marketing the film as a romance. And romance there is in the novel, but that's only a third of the book! Not to mention the other amazing two-thirds of the book! As well as Matt Damon acts in this film, he and his co-star Henry Thomas just don't pass as sixteen and seventeen year old boys. On the bright side, the cinematography is incredible and Lucas Black was the perfect Jimmy Blevins. Another huge issue I think they had with the marketing was releasing it Christmas Day. There are few movies I believe that you should release on that day/weekend, and I think that also contributed it to its low box office performance. If you've read the book, its not difficult to see where the film got hacked like crazy to the point where you wonder how an audience unfamiliar with Cormac McCarthy's novel could ever imagine the true glory that it holds. Being familiar with McCarthy's works and knowing that Billy Bob wanted more than anything to see this adaptation be done justice, I still like the film and will add it to my collection eventually. But man Miramax, if you guys hadn't helped distribute No Country for Old Men, I wouldn't have a very high opinion of you at all. Of all films that really deserve a remake, its this one. I sure wish they'd release the director's cut, but seeing the legal complications involved, I don't think it will ever see the light of day. I have a hard time believing however, with all the toil that Billy Bob took to make the film that a copy doesn't exist somewhere. So, if you know anyone who's in good with him, let me know :).
What do you think? Any films you'd like to see remade? Disagree with any of my choices?
Totally agree on Anne of Green Gables - I admit I have never seen any of the others (oh the uneducated me as to the ways of the film world) - but I would LOVE to see a legit Anne of Green Gables. Though I admit, Megan Fellows is fairly cemented in my head as Anne, and I imagine I would have a hard time buying it if it were someone else....
ReplyDelete